Category Archives: J.I. Packer

Review: Evangelism and the Sovereignty of God

By J.I. Packer

Inter-Varsity Press

God is sovereign and in control of His universe, yet man is responsible for his actions. This is difficult to understand. Still, both are taught in the Bible. Christians often solve the difficulty by either rejecting, or at least ignoring, one or the other. This is especially true in evangelism. But J.I. Packer says that both truths are important for a right understanding of evangelism.

Evangelism and the Sovereignty of God is divided into four chapters. In chapter one, “Divine Sovereignty,” Dr. Packer makes the case that all Christians believe that God is sovereign, whether they admit it or not. This is evident when they pray. “How then, do you pray? Do you ask God for your daily bread? Do you thank God for your conversion? Do you pray for the conversion of others? If the answer is “yes”—well, that proves that, whatever side you may have taken in debates on this question in the past, in your heart you believe in the sovereignty of God no less firmly than anyone else” (pg. 23).

The aim of chapter two, “Divine Sovereignty and Human Responsibility,” is to show that while God is in control of salvation, man still has the responsibility to evangelize. “God’s sovereignty and man’s responsibility are taught to us side by side in the same Bible; sometimes, indeed, in the same text….While we must always remember that it is our responsibility to proclaim salvation, we must never forget that it is God who saves” (pg. 34).

How both of these can be true is a mystery, yet Dr. Packer says that it is not a contradiction. Rather, it is an antinomy, which he defines as “an appearance of contradiction between conclusions which seem equally logical, reasonable, or necessary.” Despite the appearance of contradiction, we must remember: “A God whom we could understand exhaustively, and whose revelation of himself confronted us with no mysteries whatsoever, would be a God in man’s image and therefore an imaginary God…” (pg. 31).

In chapter three, “Evangelism,” Dr. Packer thoroughly answers four questions: “What is evangelism? What is the evangelistic message? What is the motive for evangelizing?” and “By what means and methods should evangelism be practiced?” This chapter is full of practical help grounded in sound theology.

The final chapter, “Divine Sovereignty and Evangelism,” answers the question: “Supposing that all things do in fact happen under the direct dominion of God, and that God has already fixed the future by his decree and resolved whom he will save and whom not—how does that bear on our duty to evangelize?” (pg. 104). The answer comes under two main heads:

1. “The sovereignty of God in grace does not affect anything about the nature and duty of Evangelism.”

“We are to order our lives by the light of His law, not by our guesses about his plan.” God’s sovereignty does not affect the necessity, or urgency, or genuineness of evangelism, says Dr. Packer. Nor does it affect the sinner’s responsibility for his reaction to the gospel.

2. “The sovereignty of God in grace gives us our only hope of success in evangelism.”

“We are to preach, because without knowledge of the gospel no man can be saved. We are to pray, because only the sovereign Holy Spirit in us and in man’s heart can make our preaching effective to man’s salvation…” (pg. 134).

This book exceeded my expectations. Dr. Packer gives sound answers to difficult questions. All Christians would benefit from this very helpful book; I highly recommend it.

Dr. J.I. Packer is Board of Governors Professor of Theology at Regent College in Vancouver, British Columbia. He is one of today’s most influential evangelical theologians. His best known work is Knowing God (1973).

Review: A Quest for Godliness

This weekend I finished reading J.I. Packer’s A Quest for Godliness: The Puritan Vision of the Christian Life.

Dr. Packer gives us an overview of who the English Puritans were, what they believed, and how those beliefs were worked out practically in their lives. Though it sounds like church history, I would categorize the book as practical theology. It is a challenge to the modern church to return to Biblical theology and to live and worship accordingly.

Twenty chapters are arranged under six main headings: The Puritans in Profile, The Puritans and the Bible, the Puritans and the Gospel, The Puritans and the Holy Spirit, The Puritan Christian Life, and The Puritans in Ministry. And though many of the Puritans are discussed, particular attention is paid to Richard Baxter, John Owen, and Jonathan Edwards; entire chapters are devoted to Owen and Edwards.

Regarding each topic, Dr. Packer sets out the view that was most representative of the Puritans as a whole. And he lets them speak for themselves; numerous and sometimes lengthy quotes are used throughout every chapter giving the reader a good sample of Puritan writing. And the author, though highly respectful of the Puritans, lets the reader see both their strengths and weaknesses.

Each section and chapter is interesting and edifying, but I found the chapters regarding the Puritan Christian Life particularly helpful. We would benefit from understanding and at least partially if not wholly returning to the Puritan view of the Lord’s Day, worship, marriage, and family.

Now that I’ve completed this book I’ve put it on my “most important” book shelf, right next to Calvin’s institutes. I suppose that it will be considered a reformed classic if it’s not already.

Again I See My Own Hypocrisy

Throughout my life I have known and been close to many members of the Church of Christ denomination. They are usually very sweet and sincere; their belief that salvation is partly a result of works shows in their lives, which are often moral and productive.

I have, at times, been puzzled by this thought: my sweet aunt loves me, yet she believes that I am lost because I’m not a baptized member of her particular denomination. Why, then, is she not trying to convert me? Why is she content to see me go to hell? Why are all of my Church of Christ friends, who show such kindness now, apparently indifferent about my eternal destination? I’ve had those thoughts without seeing my own hypocrisy.

This morning I read this:

“It is often said, quite fairly, that any Christian who seriously thinks that without Christ men are lost, and who seriously loves his neighbour, will not be able to rest for the thought that all around him people are going to hell, but will lay himself out unstintingly to convert others as his prime task in life; and any Christian who fails to behave this way undermines the credibility of his faith, for if he cannot himself take it seriously as setting priorities for his own living, why should anyone else take it seriously as a source of guidance for theirs.”[i]

I should apply my question to myself: why, when I profess to love my unbelieving family and friends, does it appear by my actions that I am content to see them go to hell?

[i] J.I. Packer, A Quest for Godliness

Puritans and Altar Calls

“The Puritans insisted that the ultimate effectiveness of preaching is out of man’s hands. Man’s task is simply to be faithful in teaching the word; it is God’s work to convince of its truth and write it in the heart. The Puritans would have criticised the modern evangelistic appeal, with its wheedling for ‘decisions’, as an unfortunate attempt by man to intrude into the Holy Spirit’s province. It is for God, not man, to fix the time of conversion. ‘God never laid it upon thee to covert those he sends thee to. No; to publish the gospel is thy duty…. God judgeth not of his servants’ work by the success of their labour, but by their faithfulness to deliver his message’–so says Gurnall, and he speaks for them all. When the preacher has finished instructing, applying and exhorting, his pulpit work is done. It is not his business to devise devices in order to extort ‘decisions’. He would be wiser to go away and pray for God’s blessing on what he has said.”

J.I. Packer, A Quest for Godliness