Who’s to Blame: How Barney and Bongo Drums Have Contributed to the Cowboy Church Movement

The big topic in West Texas is the lack of rain. That’s always the case, but especially this year.

Tomorrow’s forecast is typical: 103 degrees with wind. Chance of rain—zero percent. The buffalo grass is blond, the bluestem reddish-brown, both are curly and crunchy. Cattle are disappearing from the pastures. First it was lack of grass, but now the tanks are dry. It doesn’t matter how much grass or hay you have if you don’t have water. And most of the peanuts and cotton were never planted. The farmers who did plant probably won’t yield more than the ones who didn’t.

While the cowman’s funds fade, the cowboy church thrives. The group that started meeting in the cattle auction barn a few years back has become the second largest church in the county. The church is affiliated with the SBC, but the sermons, music, and fellowship cater to those who would rather ride horses than drive Hondas. Last week’s local paper advertised a ranch sorting contest to be held immediately after Sunday’s services.

That there are cowboy churches at all causes some debate. Here’s part of an email a friend sent me the other day:

“There is something about the cowboy churches or biker churches that doesn’t seem right to me. I never have been able to place my finger on it, but basically here is the question that …I can’t answer: what is there about being a cowboy that requires a church dedicated to them?

“Now I know there is lot about being a cowboy and that lifestyle and so forth, but what about it is necessitating all these western heritage churches? [W]hen I bring up my discomfort, I usually feel bad because people say, ‘Well, if one person is saved because of it, then it is a good thing.’ Then if I disagree with that statement about the fictitious ‘one person’ who is saved at all these silly things that we do in the name of Christ and His Church, I look like a total jerk.

John, as a cowboy sympathizer, what is your take on the cowboy church movement, and am I a jerk?”

And my response:

“[Friend], I agree with you completely on this. No, you’re not a jerk. Or maybe we both are, but I think that we are right….

The bottom line is that as brothers and sisters in Christ, matters of essential doctrine (or possible language barriers) should be the only things to divide us. When we create a cowboy (biker, skater, whatever) church, it says that our worldly preferences are the main priority, and that even our church has to conform to our way of life or hobbies. It’s the extreme example of churches having to be ‘culturally relevant.’”

But after my initial email, I thought more. What is it that makes the “cowboy type” uncomfortable in the average church? I think I know, partly because I can sympathize. Maybe the other churches have become too culturally relevant themselves.

Can we blame the man who still works by himself on horseback for 15 hours a day, 30 miles from town (and there are still plenty left around here), if he’s uncomfortable singing girlish pop songs from a movie screen while people wave their hands on both sides of him? Maybe he doesn’t want to hear the college boy—the one with the soul-patch and flip-flops—playing his bongo.

I’m not John Wayne, and I don’t work on horseback 15 hours a day. And while I don’t want to sit on a bale of hay while listening to a sermon from a man wearing his team roping spurs, I would prefer that to a lot of the places I’ve been. Preachers who act like Barney, music fit for little girls, rock concerts, coffee shops, intellectuals, anti-intellectuals, you name it—we have it all. Why not cowboy churches, too? If the mainline churches can have golf tournaments, splash days, and Super-Bowl parties after church, then what’s wrong with a little rough-stock riding?

Maybe this is the bottom line: if we’re going to bring contemporary culture into the churches, we need to accept the cost. Not everyone shares or appreciates our particular culture. If it was easy to find a church where the services consisted of preaching the word, singing traditional church hymns, and prayer (without all the extras), then I bet there wouldn’t be a need for cowboy churches. But if we insist on bringing our pop culture into the church, then we can’t blame the cowboys for leaving.

Comments are open, so fire away.

John MacArthur: Servant of the Word and Flock

John MacArthur: Servant of the Word and Flock

By Iain H. Murray

The Banner of Truth Trust: 2011

“Servant of the Word and Flock” is an apt subtitle for Iain Murray’s new biography of John MacArthur. The book leaves us convinced that no ministry is as important to MacArthur as serving his church by teaching and preaching God’s word. Murray points out that the one stipulation Dr. MacArthur made when accepting the call to Grace Community Church “was that he be allowed thirty hours a week for study.”

“Surely one of the greatest strengths of MacArthur’s preaching ministry is his complete confidence in the text,” Murray writes. MacArthur would take this as a compliment. “When I started ministry,” he says, “I committed myself to expository preaching, just explaining the Bible, because I know that there was nothing I could say that was anywhere near as important as what God had to say.”

Though MacArthur has served Grace Community Church for over forty years, and attendance is in the thousands, if all that he did was preach, most of us wouldn’t know his name. But that’s not the case; MacArthur writes more books than most Christians read. Murray gives ample attention to these as well as the controversy that sometimes follows (as in the case of The Gospel According to Jesus, which sparked the so-called Lordship Controversy). Because these books, including MacArthur’s Study Bible and New Testament Commentaries, are translated in dozens of languages and shipped over the world, often at no cost to the recipient, MacArthur ministers to millions whom he has never met. That doesn’t count those who listen to his sermons, free of charge, compliments of Grace to You.

Murray’s book concentrates more on MacArthur’s work than on the man himself. Still, we read about MacArthur’s past, his childhood, and how he was shaped by his father and grandfather. We read of his humility—when the only rental car available was a Cadillac, he chose to walk the last several blocks to his appointment so as not to send the wrong message. We read about his love for others, especially his family: “The family is the one environment where your devotion, faithfulness, and consistency matter most,” wrote MacArthur. Murray even dedicates an entire chapter to MacArthur’s wife, Patricia, of whom MacArthur wrote: “For every grief I ever caused her, she has given me a thousand blessings in return.” Murray shows that, as one of MacArthur’s friends said, “His greatest sermon is his life.”

While Murray’s appreciation for his subject is obvious, the book is by no means an exercise in hero-worship. Murray addresses MacArthur’s failures and sometimes disagrees with his beliefs. One preacher from Brazil speaks for many when he wonders how MacArthur can be “soteriologically reformed and dispensational at the same time.” Though Murray doesn’t dwell long on his disagreement with MacArthur’s views regarding the end times, he does state them, and he observes that a literal interpretation of Old Testament prophecy is inconsistent with the way the New Testament writers often interpreted Scripture.

Murray tells us twice that these 240 pages are “little more than a sketch; this is not the time, nor I the writer, to give a full portrait.” While it may not end up being the most complete biography, it is hard to imagine that there will be one as well-written and interesting. We do, however, have reason to agree that “this is not the time.” Though MacArthur turns 72 on the nineteenth day of this month (June 2011), he has no plans to retire:

“As the Lord permits, I hope to continue teaching God’s word and shepherding His flock until the day I go to be with Him.”

I received a complimentary copy of this book from Banner of Truth in exchange for an honest review.

Review: Give Them Grace by Elyse M. Fitzpatrick

Give Them Grace: Dazzling Your Kids with the Love of Jesus

By Elyse M. Fitzpatrick and Jessica Thompson

Crossway, 2011

In the forward to Give Them Grace by Elyse M. Fitzpatrick and Jessica Thompson, Tullian Tchividjian says it’s “the best parenting book [he’s] ever read, because it takes the radical, untamable, outrageous nature of the gospel seriously and applies it to parenting.” And the authors do take the gospel seriously. The difference between their book and other Christian parenting books, they say, is that theirs emphasizes grace rather than law:

“Most of us are painfully aware that we’re not perfect parents. We’re also deeply grieved that we don’t have perfect kids. But the remedy to our mutual imperfection isn’t more law, even if it seems to produce tidy or polite children.”

These two experienced mothers don’t pretend that they are perfect, that their children are perfect, or that they have the secret key to perfection. They don’t give readers a formula for parenting; there are no “three steps,” or even specified rod dimensions (though they do say that an open hand is okay, regardless of what other parenting books have said). Instead, they remind us that it is God, and not parents, who determines a child’s destiny in this life and the next, and that we need His grace as much as our children do. They also give lots of encouragement to weary, imperfect parents:

“[God] doesn’t treat his dear children as ‘disappointments’ whose disobedience and failures take him by surprise or shock him. He does not suspend his love until they get their acts back together. He already knows the worst about you (in yourself) and loves and approves you nonetheless (in Christ).”

If applying the gospel can be overdone, these authors do it proudly: “We’ve encouraged you to dazzle [your children] with the message of Christ’s love and welcome, and then when you think that surely they must be tiring of it, go back and drench them with it again.”

The only problem with this is that when we apply the gospel to every event in life, and especially when we use it to correct, children will tire of it. Not every moment needs to be a “teachable moment.” Do we need to bring up Jesus’ agony on the cross every time our child acts like a child?

The authors give an example of how we might apply the gospel to a child who pouts after losing a baseball game: “Yes, losing is difficult….Jesus Christ understands losing because he lost relationship with his father on the cross….He’s using this suffering in your life to make us both look up and see his love.”

Besides the superficial view of suffering in the above quote, this loose way of applying the gospel, especially when often repeated, takes the power out of the message and can weary the children. Something sadder than a child growing up never hearing the good news is a child who grows up hoping to never hear it again.

Besides overdoing the application of the gospel, the authors are also guilty, like the authors of many of our Christian books and blogs, of overwriting. Some of their words have become so popular (peruse, enjoin, facets, eventuate), that I expect to see them in half the Christian books I read, though I’ve never heard them in real conversation. Add a few phrases like, “radical message of grace,” “soul-satisfying repast of grace,” and “construct a methodology,” with extra doses of drama and intellectualisms, and an over-all good message becomes unpalatable to readers who prefer a simpler style.

Still, the most important things to be said about this book are that it leaves room for failure, emphasizes the superiority of the gospel over the law, and is primarily about imperfect parents glorifying a perfect God (rather than themselves or their children). These things put Give Them Grace above many other Christian parenting books.

I received a complimentary copy of this book from Crossway in exchange for an honest review.

Review: John Knox and the Reformation

John Knox and the Reformation

D.M. Lloyd-Jones & Iain H. Murray

The Banner of Truth Trust: 2011

In an address given in Edinburgh in 1960, Martyn Lloyd-Jones said, “perhaps the greatest of all the lessons of the Protestant Reformation is that the way of recovery is always to go back, back to the primitive pattern, to the origin, to the norm and standard which are to be found alone in the New Testament.” That the speaker was guided by faithfulness to “the norm and standard” found in the New Testament is evident in his writings, which is why I love reading him and am delighted that his work is still published years after his death.

Lloyd-Jones’s biographer, Iain H. Murray, is another advocate of looking back, and is another whose writings I can’t resist. With the Banner of Truth’s recent release of John Knox and the Reformation, I had the privilege to read both men in one book.

This short but valuable title consists of three chapters. “Remembering the Reformation” and “John Knox: the Founder of Puritanism” are addresses that Lloyd-Jones gave in 1960 to commemorate the 400th anniversary of the Reformation in Scotland. The third chapter is Iain Murray’s “John Knox and ‘The Battle’,” which is a biographical sketch of Knox that concentrates on his efforts to reform the church in Scotland.

John Knox and the Reformation is published for the 500th anniversary of the birth of Knox (2014), but not out of a “purely antiquarian or historical motive.” As Lloyd-Jones says, “the times in which we are living are too urgent and too desperate for us to indulge a mere antiquarian spirit.” Rather, “we look at these men in order that we may learn from them, and imitate and emulate their example.” He supports his view with Hebrews 13:7: “Remember your leaders, those who spoke to you the word of God. Consider the outcome of their way of life, and imitate their faith.”

Though Knox was, and still is, an object of controversy, there’s no denying that God used him greatly. Murray writes: “The only true explanation of Knox’s preaching is in words he applied to others of his fellow countrymen, ‘God gave his Holy Spirit to simple men in great abundance.’” Of a sermon that Knox preached to discouraged Protestant forces after beaten by the French, one man said, “The voice of one man is able in one hour to put more life in us than five hundred trumpets continually blustering in our ears.”

But again, the aim of this book isn’t to teach us about Knox, but to help us to learn from Knox. Lloyd-Jones and Murray each spell out the lessons that we can glean and apply to our day, and we would be wise to take heed.

When I asked what I should read for spiritual growth, a pastor and mentor told me that other than the Bible, he benefitted most from the biographies of great Christians. I’ve found this to be true for myself, and especially true of Iain Murray’s works. John Knox and the Reformation is no exception.

I received a complimentary copy of this book from The Banner of Truth Trust in exchange for an honest review.

Unleashed by Erwin McManus (Not Recommended)

In his book Unleashed, Erwin McManus says that Christianity has become too civilized. He rejects the belief that “Jesus died and rose from the dead so that you can live a life of endless comfort, security, and indulgence,” and he says that it’s his “mission to destroy the influence of the Christian cliché, ‘The safest place to be is in the center of the will of God.’”

Following Jesus is not about safety or security. McManus points out that John the Baptist lost his head while in the center of God’s will. “We look to Jesus not to fulfill our shallow longings or to provide for us creature comforts. We look to Him to lead us where He needs us most and where we can accomplish the most good.”

McManus calls Christians to reject conformity and security, and to embrace what he calls the barbarian way, which is “about love expressed through sacrifice and servant hood.” Like early followers of Christ—John the Baptist, Peter, and Paul—we “are called to a path filled with uncertainty, mystery, and risk.”

McManus presents a strong argument, and he backs it up with lots of Scripture. His overall message is good; it’s one that I love hearing, whether it comes from John Piper, David Platt, or McManus himself. But his book falls short of the others when it comes to application. How do you live out this unleashed, barbarian faith? McManus’s examples are jumping off a house, jet skiing off the coast of Wellington, and an ATV ride through the wilderness that ends in a trip to the emergency room, “a vital locale for the barbarian.”

The barbarian way also involves pursuing our dreams, going for the promotion, and striving to reach our full potential, which sounds like the prosperity gospel that McManus does such a good job of refuting. At this point the faith he describes sounds tame and unimpressive—more like self-esteem. And while McManus is often clear about what Jesus’ death did not secure, he’s not clear about what it did do. The gospel is muddied with statements like, “His purpose was to save us not from pain and suffering, but from meaninglessness.”

I’m probably missing the point. There is a radical, barbarian faith that expresses itself by street preaching in New Orleans, serving as a missionary in Haiti, or rebuking King Herod. I’m sure that McManus has these in mind rather than irresponsible recklessness, but he doesn’t make that clear, and we’re left wondering whether we should sell all that we own and give to the poor, or sell all that we own and take a dangerous vacation.

I received a complimentary copy of this book from Thomas Nelson Publishers in exchange for an honest review.

 

Review: Smooth Stones Taken From Ancient Brooks

Smooth Stones Taken From Ancient Brooks: Selections from the Writings of Thomas Brooks by C.H. Spurgeon

Thomas Brooks

Banner of Truth Trust: 2011

Students of Charles Spurgeon know that he loved the Puritans. He poured over volumes of their books until their words poured out of him. One of his favorite Puritan authors was the 17th century Independent pastor Thomas Brooks. “Had Brooks been a worldly man,” writes Spurgeon, “his writings would have been most valuable; but since he was an eminent Christian, they are doubly so.”

Smooth Stones is Spurgeon’s collection of “sentences, illustrations, and quaint sayings” gleaned from Brooks’ six volume Works. It was first published in 1855, but is now Banner of Truth Trust’s latest in the Puritan Paperbacks series.

Like the author of the book of Proverbs, Brooks repeats the same themes in a variety of ways, and always with a different twist. “He saw similes, metaphors, and allegories everywhere; but they were all consecrated to his Master’s service:”

“Were riches ever true to them that trusted them? As the bird hops from twig to twig, so do riches hop from man to man.”

Readers will find plenty in Brooks’ writings to convict, humble, and warn them: “But as for such as cannot spare time to seek God in secret, they sufficiently manifest that they have little friendship or fellowship with Him to whom they so seldom come.” Or, “Open profaneness is the broad road that leads to hell, but closet duties rested in, is a sure though cleaner path.”

But Brooks doesn’t just shoot his arrows and leave readers in despair; there is something comforting or encouraging on every page. And whether convicting or comforting, Christ is always foremost: “Christ is the sun, and all the watches of our lives should be set by the dial of his motion.”

This excellent edition could be improved with more careful editing. We are told that, “The wick of a candle is little worth, and yet less where it smokes, yielding neither light nor heat, but father offends with an ill smell, which man cannot bear,” (page 36). And we don’t know whether to despair or rejoice when we read that the Lord says, “I will never have thee nor forsake thee,” (page 14). Such are the fruits of relying on technology. These errors don’t abound, but they do detract from the overall quality.

There is a disadvantage to reading quotes that are removed from the larger context. Readers may, in places, see the appearance of contraction, at least on the surface. But Smooth Stones is excellent for devotional reading, and is also a good introduction to the vast writings of Thomas Brooks. Over the last several mornings it has moved me to pray, increased my appetite for the Scriptures, and given me something to think about throughout the day.

I received a complimentary copy of this book from Banner of Truth Trust in exchange for an honest review.

On Christian Parenting Books, Spankings, and Imperfect Children: A Ramble

A kind reader asked me what I thought was lacking in Christian parenting books. My response? “I’ll get back to you on that.” It’s been a few days, but I still don’t have an answer. Anyway, why ask me?

I’ve read a few books on parenting that wear a Christian label. Some deserve the name, and some don’t. A few were good, but most were disappointing in one way or another.

I’m especially turned off by books—or parents—that have the answer. For example, if you spank for every infraction, with such and such a rod of such and such a diameter, and of course throw in a prayer when you’re finished, you will not only have perfect children, but they’ll even thank you for it.

I’m not saying that I’m against spanking when appropriate. My point is that I am put off by the smug and pious tone of some Christian parenting books. Have ye perfect children? Fine; keep them to yourself.

The most recent books I’ve read talk less about discipline. That’s refreshing. We do hope, after all, that most of our parenting time is spent in non-disciplinary activities.

What’s lacking in parenting books? I don’t know. Maybe they are as good as they can be. After all, one can only learn so much from reading.

When our oldest was a toddler, we read a popular book. I’m not speaking for my wife—she’s more humble than I—but I became an instant expert. I even took it upon myself to give my parents advice on dealing with another grandchild. They were gracious enough to not tell me that I didn’t know what I was talking about.

After seven years, I’ve only learned that I knew nothing, and that my children have taught me far more than any book (though I still know nothing). We’ve also learned that spanking, despite what most Christian writers say, is not always effective. And that what is effective with one child might not be with the next.

What do you do when “the rod” frustrates a child or provokes them to wrath? Our fundamentalist friends would say to keep spanking the children until they’re happy. I say that I’m glad they aren’t my parents, regardless of how much their children thank them for their spankings.

So you spank, pray, spank your child until he prays, home-school, throw out the TV, and dress your child like Theodore Cleaver, but he’s still not perfect. Then what? Then you trust God and take it one day at a time. And in the meantime, thank Him that you don’t have perfect children. Ours are precious blessings, but not perfect. If they were, they would be out-of-place in our home. And give them lots of love, and be glad that they are so forgiving.

That’s a long, rambling way to say that I don’t know how to improve Christian parenting books; if I did, I’d write one myself. They are what they are, just like our kids.

Comments are open.

We’re Not Required to Swallow Camels

He hath shewed thee, O man, what is good; and what doth the Lord require of thee, but to do justly, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with thy God? Micah 6:8.

I have the urge to judge myself according to the big things I have or haven’t—mostly haven’t—done. And when I see the lack of greatness, I feel guilty, and I want to do something. (A wise man said that we are all arminians by nature.) I want to get a degree in theology, or write “the definitive book on” whatever, or be a martyred missionary. Why is that? It’s because I think too highly of myself.

Pride makes the mortal want immortality. Vanity makes me want to be more than I am. How easily I forget God’s greatness while I search for my own.

Does God require, or even desire, for us to do great things? What He desires of us, He will accomplish through us. What does He require? Justice, mercy, and humility, says Micah. God wants us to look to Him. To walk with him, humbly, like a child. And he wants us to love Him and others. In my zeal to do something bigger, I forget what God requires.

God help us not to strain at gnats in our zeal to swallow camels.

The March Book Giveaway Winner is…

the one and only Eddie Eddings of Calvinistic Cartoons. As Eddie would say, he was divinely predestined to win. Apparently so.

In reviewing the entries, I realized that almost everyone in the drawing has received at least one book through this site. It’s more like a book club with regular members than a blog, which is fine with me.

Spring beckons; I’m spending more time turning dirt in the garden than pages in a book. And real life goes on–my book funds have been spent on more pressing needs, so things will be slow around here for a while.

In the meantime, read or re-read a good book, read it slowly, and read it for all that it’s worth.

March Book Giveaway

This month I’ll give away one hardback copy of R.C. Sproul’s excellent book, Abortion: A Rational Look at an Emotional Issue. To enter, send an email through the contact form below. I’ll draw a winner at the end of next week.

You can read my review here.